Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
      • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
      • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: case study

  • Home
  • case study
When the Regulator Looks Away: A Blind Client’s Ordeal Through Legal Misconduct and Institutional Evasion
Regulatory Matters

When the Regulator Looks Away: A Blind Client’s Ordeal Through Legal Misconduct and Institutional Evasion

Written by John Barwell 7 September 202518 August 2026

A blind client’s ordeal with the Ministry of Justice reveals how insurers, solicitors, and the SRA collude to deny justice and accountability.

Unveiling the Hidden Conflicts: How Ongoing Fiduciary Duties Impact Legal Ethics
Case Studies

Unveiling the Hidden Conflicts: How Ongoing Fiduciary Duties Impact Legal Ethics

Written by John Barwell 21 June 202419 August 2026

Breach of fiduciary duty and conflict of interest by Burnetts Solicitors LLP highlight the need for stronger regulatory oversight and ethical standards in legal practice.

Real-World Implications of Conflict of Interest in Legal Practices: A Case Analysis of Burnetts Solicitors
Legal Ethics

Real-World Implications of Conflict of Interest in Legal Practices: A Case Analysis of Burnetts Solicitors

Written by John Barwell 14 May 202419 August 2026

Examining ethical breaches by solicitors and the need for regulatory reforms to protect clients, focusing on fiduciary duty guidelines and conflicts of interest.

A Question of Loyalty: Ethical Conflicts and Fiduciary Breaches in Legal Practice
Case Studies

A Question of Loyalty: Ethical Conflicts and Fiduciary Breaches in Legal Practice

Written by John Barwell 12 May 202419 August 2026

Examining fiduciary duties and conflicts of interest in the legal profession through a case study of Burnetts Solicitors, highlighting the need for ethical standards and regulatory reforms.

Misuse of Confidentiality Language by UK Solicitors: Ethical Implications and the Burnetts Case Study
Case Studies

Misuse of Confidentiality Language by UK Solicitors: Ethical Implications and the Burnetts Case Study

Written by John Barwell 11 May 202419 August 2026

Examining the misuse of confidentiality language by UK solicitors, its ethical implications, and the need for clear communication and professional conduct to maintain client trust.

Recent Posts

  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
  • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
  • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy