Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
      • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
      • Money before judgment: the CPR Part 25 interim payment that can release part of your claim early
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
      • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
      • Money before judgment: the CPR Part 25 interim payment that can release part of your claim early
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: Equality Act 2010

  • Home
  • Equality Act 2010
When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act
Regulatory Matters

When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act

Written by John Barwell 30 July 202619 August 2026

The EAT overturned the strike-out of race discrimination complaints in Waithaka v Barclays. The judgment explains why different managers, incidents and forms of treatment may still form part of one continuing state of affairs for Equality Act time-limit purposes.

Judicial Guidance Quietly Removes Written Evidence Option for Disabled Litigants
Regulatory Matters

Judicial Guidance Quietly Removes Written Evidence Option for Disabled Litigants

Written by John Barwell 14 January 202618 August 2026

A quiet May 2025 change to the Equal Treatment Bench Book removed a written-only evidence adjustment for mental health disabilities—raising concerns about access to justice as tribunals demand increasingly “objective” medical proof for adjustments and postponements.

Legal and Human Rights Frameworks – Bridging the Gap between Law and Practice
Regulatory Matters

Legal and Human Rights Frameworks – Bridging the Gap between Law and Practice

Written by John Barwell 2 May 202518 August 2026

Britain’s vaunted equality framework masks a daily reality where disabled and neurodivergent people remain excluded, detained and ignored because weak enforcement, elastic legal tests and political drift strip statutory rights of practical meaning.

The Weaponisation of Identity Politics
Regulatory Matters

The Weaponisation of Identity Politics

Written by John Barwell 28 April 202518 August 2026

Weaponised identity politics is corroding UK public life by turning honest criticism into hate smears—here’s why it matters and what we can do.

When the System Works: A Positive Experience with the Financial Ombudsman Service
Case Studies

When the System Works: A Positive Experience with the Financial Ombudsman Service

Written by John Barwell 6 February 202518 August 2026

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is often seen as a bureaucratic maze where complaints drag on and consumers feel unheard. Yet, my recent experience challenged this perception.

Mental Health and the Legal System: Why the Current Framework Fails Litigants in Person (LiPs)
Dispute Resolution

Mental Health and the Legal System: Why the Current Framework Fails Litigants in Person (LiPs)

Written by John Barwell 9 December 202418 August 2026

The legal system’s failure to support Litigants in Person (LiPs) is causing significant mental health challenges, exposing the urgent need for reform.

Recent Posts

  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
  • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
  • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
  • Money before judgment: the CPR Part 25 interim payment that can release part of your claim early
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy