Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
      • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
      • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: legal proceedings

  • Home
  • legal proceedings
Vexatious Conduct in Legal Proceedings: A Common Strategy and How to Avoid the Trap
Legal Processes

Vexatious Conduct in Legal Proceedings: A Common Strategy and How to Avoid the Trap

Written by John Barwell 9 October 202418 August 2026

Vexatious conduct involves disruptive behaviour in legal proceedings aimed at undermining justice, and claimants can avoid falling into this trap by maintaining composure, careful communication, and professional conduct.

The Legal Consequences of Releasing ‘Without Prejudice’ Information: Pre, During, and Post Legal Proceedings
Case Studies

The Legal Consequences of Releasing ‘Without Prejudice’ Information: Pre, During, and Post Legal Proceedings

Written by John Barwell 1 September 202418 August 2026

Understanding the nuances of ‘without prejudice’ communications is crucial in UK legal proceedings. This article explores the consequences of inadvertent disclosure and offers essential guidance.

A Continuation of My Struggle with the ICO’s Reactive Stance on Subject Access Requests
Case Studies

A Continuation of My Struggle with the ICO’s Reactive Stance on Subject Access Requests

Written by John Barwell 14 August 202417 August 2026

The ICO’s failure to address conflicts of interest in SAR enforcement undermines data protection rights under UK GDPR, raising concerns about their regulatory effectiveness.

The ICO’s Latest Blunder: Allowing Conflicted Parties to Process SARs
Case Studies

The ICO’s Latest Blunder: Allowing Conflicted Parties to Process SARs

Written by John Barwell 13 August 202417 August 2026

Critical examination of the ICO’s failure to enforce UK GDPR rights in handling SARs, highlighting conflicts of interest and inconsistent regulation.

The Neuroscience of Confirmation Bias: Implications for Legal Proceedings and Therapeutic Approaches
Dispute Resolution

The Neuroscience of Confirmation Bias: Implications for Legal Proceedings and Therapeutic Approaches

Written by John Barwell 9 August 202417 August 2026

Understanding confirmation bias is crucial for Litigants in Person to improve decision-making in UK legal proceedings.

Sellafield’s Cybersecurity Failings: An In-Depth Examination
Case Studies

Sellafield’s Cybersecurity Failings: An In-Depth Examination

Written by John Barwell 24 June 202419 August 2026

Sellafield pleads guilty to cybersecurity failings, exposing vulnerabilities at the UK’s top nuclear site. Legal proceedings highlight urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures.

Recent Posts

  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
  • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
  • Winning in the small claims track and still being out of pocket: the costs you cannot recover
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy