Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
      • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
      • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: legal realism

  • Home
  • legal realism
Why the British justice system sometimes feels morally unfair
Dispute Resolution

Why the British justice system sometimes feels morally unfair

Written by John Barwell 24 January 202618 August 2026

Why courts often reach outcomes that feel unfair — and what litigants in person must understand about law, evidence, and procedure in England & Wales.

Recent Posts

  • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
  • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
  • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy