Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • No substantial dispute of fact? The Part 8 route for civil claims
      • When a witness will not attend: witness summonses under CPR Part 34
      • Complaining to the ICO after the Data (Use and Access) Act: the new complaint-handling duty and what it changes
      • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
      • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • No substantial dispute of fact? The Part 8 route for civil claims
      • When a witness will not attend: witness summonses under CPR Part 34
      • Complaining to the ICO after the Data (Use and Access) Act: the new complaint-handling duty and what it changes
      • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
      • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: rule 32

  • Home
  • rule 32
Employment Tribunal postponements: when a hearing can be moved and how to ask
Employment Law and Tribunals

Employment Tribunal postponements: when a hearing can be moved and how to ask

Written by John Barwell 17 September 202617 September 2026

Moving a listed Employment Tribunal hearing takes a formal application, not a diary note. This guide explains the rule 32 test in the 2024 Rules, what the presidential guidance expects a postponement request to contain, and the timing and evidence that decide whether it succeeds.

Recent Posts

  • No substantial dispute of fact? The Part 8 route for civil claims
  • When a witness will not attend: witness summonses under CPR Part 34
  • Complaining to the ICO after the Data (Use and Access) Act: the new complaint-handling duty and what it changes
  • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
  • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy