Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act
      • Mental Health and Sanctions in Employment Tribunals
      • Employment Tribunal Adjustments for Vulnerable Litigants
      • When the Process Becomes Part of the Harm: Mental Health and Litigants in Person in the Employment Tribunal
      • The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act
      • Mental Health and Sanctions in Employment Tribunals
      • Employment Tribunal Adjustments for Vulnerable Litigants
      • When the Process Becomes Part of the Harm: Mental Health and Litigants in Person in the Employment Tribunal
      • The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: security for costs

  • Home
  • access to justice
  • Page 3
“Computer Says No”: When Civil Courts Penalise the Public for Their Own Errors
Case Studies

“Computer Says No”: When Civil Courts Penalise the Public for Their Own Errors

Written by John Barwell 2 July 202518 August 2026

CE-File rejections turned a routine N244 into a £125k catastrophe, spotlighting how civil-court processes punish litigants in person.

Recent Posts

  • When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act
  • Mental Health and Sanctions in Employment Tribunals
  • Employment Tribunal Adjustments for Vulnerable Litigants
  • When the Process Becomes Part of the Harm: Mental Health and Litigants in Person in the Employment Tribunal
  • The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy