Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
      • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
      • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
      • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
      • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: TUPE

  • Home
  • TUPE
Wrong Respondent in Employment Tribunal Claims: Why the Name on the ET1 Matters
Dispute Resolution

Wrong Respondent in Employment Tribunal Claims: Why the Name on the ET1 Matters

Written by John Barwell 31 May 202618 August 2026

The respondent named on the ET1 is not a formatting detail. It can affect whether the claim is accepted, whether it matches the Acas certificate, whether it can be served, whether limitation is protected, and whether any judgment can be enforced.

Recent Posts

  • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
  • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
  • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
  • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
  • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy