Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Author: John Barwell

  • Home
  • John Barwell
  • Page 31
The Funding Conundrum: Analysing the Implications of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s Funding Model
Regulatory Matters

The Funding Conundrum: Analysing the Implications of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s Funding Model

Written by John Barwell 11 June 202419 August 2026

The SRA’s funding model compromises its impartiality and effectiveness, raising concerns about regulatory integrity and public trust.

Exposed: How Misclassification of Criminal Acts as Civil Disputes is Shielding Fraudsters from Justice!
Commercial Property Disputes

Exposed: How Misclassification of Criminal Acts as Civil Disputes is Shielding Fraudsters from Justice!

Written by John Barwell 11 June 202419 August 2026

Fraudulent property dispute highlights need for reclassification as criminal under Theft Act and Fraud Act. Call for justice and accountability.

Exposed: Why the CPS Fails to Prosecute Big UK Law Firms for Financial Crimes!
Legal Processes

Exposed: Why the CPS Fails to Prosecute Big UK Law Firms for Financial Crimes!

Written by John Barwell 11 June 202419 August 2026

Exploring the CPS’s evolution and role in prosecuting business crimes, this article highlights challenges in bringing UK law firms to justice and proposes comprehensive reforms.

Analysing CEDR’s Failures in Overlooking Key Evidence in the SRA Complaint Process
UK Legal System

Analysing CEDR’s Failures in Overlooking Key Evidence in the SRA Complaint Process

Written by John Barwell 10 June 202419 August 2026

Critical insights into SRA and CEDR’s complaint handling reveal significant procedural failures, impacting public trust and regulatory oversight effectiveness.

Struggling Against the Tide: The Internal Challenges of Legal Ombudsman Investigators
Regulatory Matters

Struggling Against the Tide: The Internal Challenges of Legal Ombudsman Investigators

Written by John Barwell 10 June 202419 August 2026

Internal issues at the Legal Ombudsman and similar bodies undermine the quality and impartiality of investigations, calling for urgent systemic reform.

Exposed: The Shocking Failures of UK Legal Regulators – Why Your Justice Is at Risk!
Regulatory Matters

Exposed: The Shocking Failures of UK Legal Regulators – Why Your Justice Is at Risk!

Written by John Barwell 10 June 202419 August 2026

UK legal regulators face crisis due to mismanagement, conflicts of interest, and systemic inefficiencies. Comprehensive reforms are needed to restore trust.

Investigating the ICO: How the Information Commissioner’s Office Failed to Identify GDPR Non-Compliance by Burnetts Solicitors
Case Studies

Investigating the ICO: How the Information Commissioner’s Office Failed to Identify GDPR Non-Compliance by Burnetts Solicitors

Written by John Barwell 9 June 202419 August 2026

The ICO’s failure to address GDPR non-compliance by Burnetts Solicitors undermines public trust and highlights broader issues in regulatory oversight and accountability.

Investigating the Legal Ombudsman: How the Legal Ombudsman Failed to Identify Conflict of Interest and Fiduciary Duty Breaches
Case Studies

Investigating the Legal Ombudsman: How the Legal Ombudsman Failed to Identify Conflict of Interest and Fiduciary Duty Breaches

Written by John Barwell 8 June 202419 August 2026

The Legal Ombudsman’s failure to address ethical breaches by Burnetts Solicitors in conflict of interest cases undermines public trust and calls for urgent reforms.

Investigating the CEDR: How the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution Failed to Hold the SRA Accountable
Case Studies

Investigating the CEDR: How the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution Failed to Hold the SRA Accountable

Written by John Barwell 7 June 202419 August 2026

The CEDR’s failure to address ethical breaches by Burnetts Solicitors and the SRA exposes broader issues of compromised independence and bias in regulatory oversight.

Investigating the SRA: How the Solicitors Regulation Authority Failed Me and the Public
Case Studies

Investigating the SRA: How the Solicitors Regulation Authority Failed Me and the Public

Written by John Barwell 6 June 202419 August 2026

The SRA’s failure to address conflicts of interest and enforce ethical guidelines in the legal profession highlights systemic issues undermining public trust and regulatory integrity.

Page navigation

Previous 1 … 29 30 31 32 33 … 41 Next

Recent Posts

  • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
  • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy