Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest PostsNEW
      • When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act
      • Mental Health and Sanctions in Employment Tribunals
      • Employment Tribunal Adjustments for Vulnerable Litigants
      • When the Process Becomes Part of the Harm: Mental Health and Litigants in Person in the Employment Tribunal
      • The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions
    • Case Studies
      • Dispute Resolution Cases
      • Legal Innovation Cases
      • Legal Practice Cases
      • Regulatory Cases
      • UK Legal System Cases
    • Dispute Resolution
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Commercial Property Disputes
      • Employment Law and Tribunals
      • Litigants in Person
    • Legal Innovation
      • Legal Technology and Innovation
    • Legal Practice
      • Legal Education and Development
      • Legal Ethics
      • Legal Representation
      • Mental Health in Legal Profession
    • Regulatory Matters
      • Data Protection and GDPR
      • Regulatory Oversight
      • Whistleblowing and Public Interest
    • UK Legal System
      • Access to Justice
      • Judicial Conduct
      • Legal Processes
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Resource Hub
    • Factsheets
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
    • ToolsFREE
  • Contact
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest PostsNEW
      • When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act
      • Mental Health and Sanctions in Employment Tribunals
      • Employment Tribunal Adjustments for Vulnerable Litigants
      • When the Process Becomes Part of the Harm: Mental Health and Litigants in Person in the Employment Tribunal
      • The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions
    • Case Studies
      • Dispute Resolution Cases
      • Legal Innovation Cases
      • Legal Practice Cases
      • Regulatory Cases
      • UK Legal System Cases
    • Dispute Resolution
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Commercial Property Disputes
      • Employment Law and Tribunals
      • Litigants in Person
    • Legal Innovation
      • Legal Technology and Innovation
    • Legal Practice
      • Legal Education and Development
      • Legal Ethics
      • Legal Representation
      • Mental Health in Legal Profession
    • Regulatory Matters
      • Data Protection and GDPR
      • Regulatory Oversight
      • Whistleblowing and Public Interest
    • UK Legal System
      • Access to Justice
      • Judicial Conduct
      • Legal Processes
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Resource Hub
    • Factsheets
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
    • ToolsFREE
  • Contact
Search for:
Log in
Register

Category: Dispute Resolution

  • Home
  • workplace grievance
Wrong Respondent in Employment Tribunal Claims: Why the Name on the ET1 Matters
Dispute Resolution

Wrong Respondent in Employment Tribunal Claims: Why the Name on the ET1 Matters

Written by John Barwell 31 May 20265 August 2026

The respondent named on the ET1 is not a formatting detail. It can affect whether the claim is accepted, whether it matches the Acas certificate, whether it can be served, whether limitation is protected, and whether any judgment can be enforced.

Interim Relief in Whistleblowing Dismissal Claims: The Seven-Day Deadline
Dispute Resolution

Interim Relief in Whistleblowing Dismissal Claims: The Seven-Day Deadline

Written by John Barwell 30 May 20265 August 2026

Interim relief is one of the most urgent Employment Tribunal remedies. In qualifying whistleblowing dismissal claims, a claimant may need to apply within seven days of the effective date of termination.

ET1 Drafting: Why Your Employment Tribunal Claim Is Not Just Your Workplace Story
Dispute Resolution

ET1 Drafting: Why Your Employment Tribunal Claim Is Not Just Your Workplace Story

Written by John Barwell 29 May 20265 August 2026

An ET1 is not a diary, grievance bundle, appeal letter or witness statement. It is the pleaded starting point of the Employment Tribunal claim.

Acas Early Conciliation: The ET1 Trap Claimants Cannot Afford to Miss
Dispute Resolution

Acas Early Conciliation: The ET1 Trap Claimants Cannot Afford to Miss

Written by John Barwell 28 May 20265 August 2026

Acas Early Conciliation is not just a pre-claim formality. It can pause time and produce the certificate needed for an ET1, but mistakes with certificate numbers, exemptions, respondent names or deadlines can still put a claim at risk.

Do You Really Have Six Months to Bring an Employment Tribunal Claim?
Dispute Resolution

Do You Really Have Six Months to Bring an Employment Tribunal Claim?

Written by John Barwell 27 May 20265 August 2026

Do not assume you have six months to bring an Employment Tribunal claim. Current time limits, Acas early conciliation and interim relief still need urgent case-specific checking.

What is new in Employment Tribunal law in 2026?
Dispute Resolution

What is new in Employment Tribunal law in 2026?

Written by John Barwell 26 May 20265 August 2026

Employment Tribunal law is changing in stages in 2026. Some rights are already in force, further reforms are expected later in the year, and ordinary unfair dismissal changes are due in 2027. This explainer sets out what workers and employers need to check now.

Employment Tribunals: The Problem Starts Long Before the Hearing
Dispute Resolution

Employment Tribunals: The Problem Starts Long Before the Hearing

Written by John Barwell 21 May 20265 August 2026

Most workers do not start with an ET1. They reach employment tribunal after workplace processes, grievances, Acas early conciliation and settlement opportunities have failed. Reform must start before the tribunal door.

High-conflict clients: why boundaries are part of good client care
Dispute Resolution

High-conflict clients: why boundaries are part of good client care

Written by John Barwell 30 March 20265 August 2026

A practical framework for managing high-conflict clients while protecting process integrity, professional independence, and client care standards.

Why the British justice system sometimes feels morally unfair
Dispute Resolution

Why the British justice system sometimes feels morally unfair

Written by John Barwell 24 January 20265 August 2026

Why courts often reach outcomes that feel unfair — and what litigants in person must understand about law, evidence, and procedure in England & Wales.

“Computer Says No”: When Civil Courts Penalise the Public for Their Own Errors
Case Studies

“Computer Says No”: When Civil Courts Penalise the Public for Their Own Errors

Written by John Barwell 2 July 20255 August 2026

CE-File rejections turned a routine N244 into a £125k catastrophe, spotlighting how civil-court processes punish litigants in person.

Page navigation

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 11 Next

Latest updates

Saminah Anwar became a registered member 1 day, 1 hour ago

Admin and Profile picture of Neil SNeil S are now friends 2 days, 22 hours ago

Admin and Profile picture of Sasha RodoySasha Rodoy are now friends 3 days, 13 hours ago

Admin and Profile picture of Jeff brownJeff brown are now friends 3 days, 16 hours ago

Noahadam became a registered member 5 days, 16 hours ago

Recent Posts

  • When Separate Incidents May Form One Continuing Act
  • Mental Health and Sanctions in Employment Tribunals
  • Employment Tribunal Adjustments for Vulnerable Litigants
  • When the Process Becomes Part of the Harm: Mental Health and Litigants in Person in the Employment Tribunal
  • The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions

Recent Comments

  1. Steluta Artimenco on Shocking Scandal: Top London Judges Caught in Legal Corruption!
  2. Phil Wise on The ICO: A Regulator in Name Only
  3. Steven MacDiarmid on Unmasking an ‘Old Boys’ Club’: Freemasonry, Whistleblowers and the UK Justice System
  4. Sara on Is the UK Justice System Rigged? Corruption, Conflicts of Interest, and the Old Boys’ Club Exposed
  5. David George Beckett on Shocking Scandal: Top London Judges Caught in Legal Corruption!
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy