Allegations of misconduct by two senior London judges threaten to undermine the integrity of the Royal Courts of Justice.
Written by John Barwell
Written by John Barwell
Written by John Barwell
An open letter demanding urgent reform of the Solicitors Regulation Authority due to repeated regulatory failures.
Written by John Barwell
Judges must call out misconduct and promote transparency to restore public trust in the UK’s legal system.
Written by John Barwell
Concerns about Freemasonry’s influence in the UK’s police and judiciary persist, highlighting the need for renewed scrutiny and updated transparency measures to restore public trust and ensure institutional integrity.
Written by John Barwell
Conflicts of interest, hidden networks, and a lack of accountability plague the UK justice system—who stands to benefit, and what needs to change?
Written by John Barwell
A new judicial exemption under the Data Protection Act 2018 limits access to judges’ notes, quietly curbing transparency and sparking debate on fairness and accountability.
Written by John Barwell
This article critically examines procedural and ethical concerns in a lease forfeiture case involving Burnetts Solicitors. Issues include the concealment of a bailiff’s identity, non-compliance with transparency obligations, and significant procedural anomalies, calling into question the firm’s adherence to ethical standards.
Written by John Barwell
Litigants in person · Procedural fairness · Legal accountability Litigants in person often face a procedural contest as well as a legal one. When documents arrive late, tactical correspondence escalates pressure, or professional opponents rely on procedural complexity, the practical question is not only whether the rules were technically followed. It is whether the process … Continue reading “Why Do Solicitors and Barristers Bend the Rules? The Pernicious Underside of the UK Legal System”
Written by John Barwell
The Midgley v Vossloh Cogifer UK Ltd case reveals how unethical tactics by experienced legal professionals can mislead the court, especially against unrepresented claimants, leading to unintended legal outcomes. This article explores the implications for tribunal governance and legal ethics.
Written by John Barwell
Access to justice · Litigants in person · Public confidence The justice system is often described as fair, neutral and accessible. For many litigants in person, that description does not match the lived experience. The deeper issue is not simply individual disappointment with case outcomes, but whether the system gives unrepresented people a realistic opportunity … Continue reading “The Misconception of Fairness in the UK Justice System: A Litigant in Person’s Perspective”