Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: Freedom of Information

  • Home
  • Freedom of Information
John Edwards, the ICO and the accountability question at the heart of the UK’s data watchdog
Regulatory Matters

John Edwards, the ICO and the accountability question at the heart of the UK’s data watchdog

Written by John Barwell 10 June 202618 August 2026

A careful Legal Lens analysis of John Edwards, the ICO, reported leadership uncertainty and the accountability standards expected of the UK’s data watchdog.

When Oversight Fails: How the Teignbridge Planning Scandal Exposed a National Protection Racket
Regulatory Matters

When Oversight Fails: How the Teignbridge Planning Scandal Exposed a National Protection Racket

Written by John Barwell 27 October 202518 August 2026

A Devon planning case has unravelled into a nationwide exposure of how Britain’s oversight bodies protect one another — and not the public they serve.

Is the ICO Truly Doing Its Job? A Regulator That Reacts, Not Protects
Regulatory Matters

Is the ICO Truly Doing Its Job? A Regulator That Reacts, Not Protects

Written by John Barwell 23 February 202518 August 2026

The ICO’s reluctance to enforce transparency raises critical questions about whether it is protecting information rights or shielding organisations from scrutiny.

The ICO’s Uncorrectable Mistake: How a Flawed Decision Notice Obscures Corporate Mismanagement
Case Studies

The ICO’s Uncorrectable Mistake: How a Flawed Decision Notice Obscures Corporate Mismanagement

Written by John Barwell 13 February 202518 August 2026

The ICO’s refusal to correct factual errors in a Decision Notice raises serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and the risk of regulatory bodies enabling misinformation.

Analysis: The ICO’s Lofty Promises Crumble Under the Weight of Reality
Regulatory Matters

Analysis: The ICO’s Lofty Promises Crumble Under the Weight of Reality

Written by John Barwell 5 January 202518 August 2026

An analysis exposing the ICO’s 2024 failures and questioning its ability to protect public information rights.

Recent Posts

  • Costs in the Employment Tribunal: how rare rule 76 orders really are, and what actually triggers them
  • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy