Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: Judicial Misconduct

  • Home
  • Judicial Misconduct
Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
Judicial Conduct

Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do

Written by John Barwell 19 October 202619 October 2026

A bad hearing often sends litigants in person straight to the judicial complaints office — usually the wrong door. This guide maps the boundary between conduct and decision, the three-month JCIO complaint window, the sanctions that can actually follow, and the route (complaint, appeal, or both) that can deliver something.

Whistleblowers Demand Accountability: Calls Grow for Investigation into Employment Judge Lancaster
Regulatory Matters

Whistleblowers Demand Accountability: Calls Grow for Investigation into Employment Judge Lancaster

Written by John Barwell 11 September 202518 August 2026

Justice Without Judges, Silence in Session—captures the systemic silence eroding fairness in UK tribunals.

Employment Tribunals and Systemic Barriers for Litigants in Person (LiPs): A Case for Reform
Regulatory Matters

Employment Tribunals and Systemic Barriers for Litigants in Person (LiPs): A Case for Reform

Written by John Barwell 30 March 202518 August 2026

Employment tribunals were meant to be accessible for all, but unrepresented claimants—known as Litigants in Person—face a justice system that’s structurally rigged.

What Can Employment Tribunal Observers Do After a Hearing?
Dispute Resolution

What Can Employment Tribunal Observers Do After a Hearing?

Written by John Barwell 18 February 202518 August 2026

Observers in employment tribunals are vital in ensuring justice by documenting proceedings and addressing misconduct.

Paul Millinder’s Legal Odyssey Enters a New Phase
Dispute Resolution

Paul Millinder’s Legal Odyssey Enters a New Phase

Written by John Barwell 17 February 202518 August 2026

For years, businessman Paul Millinder has been labelled a vexatious litigant, his pursuit of justice dismissed as obsessive. Yet, his case reveals a troubling pattern of judicial manoeuvring, fraudulent insolvency proceedings, and suppressed evidence.

Shocking Scandal: Top London Judges Caught in Legal Corruption!
Case Studies

Shocking Scandal: Top London Judges Caught in Legal Corruption!

Written by John Barwell 20 November 202418 August 2026

Allegations of misconduct by two senior London judges threaten to undermine the integrity of the Royal Courts of Justice.

Recent Posts

  • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
  • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy