Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
      • Judicial review for litigants in person: the three-month clock and the permission stage
      • Part 36 offers: the costs trap waiting for litigants in person who say no
      • The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman: what the final complaint stage can actually deliver
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
      • Judicial review for litigants in person: the three-month clock and the permission stage
      • Part 36 offers: the costs trap waiting for litigants in person who say no
      • The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman: what the final complaint stage can actually deliver
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: reasons for decisions

  • Home
  • reasons for decisions
The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions
Regulatory Matters

The Issue Map: Why Unclear Complaints Produce Unclear Decisions

Written by John Barwell 12 July 202619 August 2026

A complaint can contain a detailed chronology and extensive evidence while leaving the central questions undefined. An issue map separates the issues, positions, evidence, findings and outcomes that require a decision.

The Template Decision: When Standard Wording Replaces Individual Reasoning
Regulatory Matters

The Template Decision: When Standard Wording Replaces Individual Reasoning

Written by John Barwell 11 July 202619 August 2026

Templates can improve clarity and consistency. The accountability problem begins when standard wording replaces engagement with the individual complaint, evidence and circumstances.

Administrative Closure Is Not Resolution: The Problem with Final Responses That Do Not Answer the Complaint
Regulatory Matters

Administrative Closure Is Not Resolution: The Problem with Final Responses That Do Not Answer the Complaint

Written by John Barwell 5 July 202619 August 2026

A final response may close a file, but that does not always mean the complaint has been answered. Administrative closure belongs to the process. Substantive resolution belongs to the issue.

When Evidence Disappears from the Decision: Why the Record Matters
Regulatory Matters

When Evidence Disappears from the Decision: Why the Record Matters

Written by John Barwell 3 July 202619 August 2026

A decision does not need to discuss every document. But where central evidence disappears from the reasoning, the person affected may be unable to understand how the issue, evidence, finding and outcome connect.

When “Reasons” Are Not Reasons: Why Unexplained Decisions Defeat Accountability
Regulatory Matters

When “Reasons” Are Not Reasons: Why Unexplained Decisions Defeat Accountability

Written by John Barwell 1 July 202619 August 2026

Outcome is not explanation. Reasons matter because they make decisions intelligible, accountable and capable of proper scrutiny.

Recent Posts

  • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
  • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
  • Judicial review for litigants in person: the three-month clock and the permission stage
  • Part 36 offers: the costs trap waiting for litigants in person who say no
  • The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman: what the final complaint stage can actually deliver
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy