Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: UK Law

  • Home
  • UK Law
  • Page 9
Examining Narcissistic Traits and Dark Manipulation in the UK Legal Profession
Legal Ethics

Examining Narcissistic Traits and Dark Manipulation in the UK Legal Profession

Written by John Barwell 12 July 202417 August 2026

Examining the presence of narcissistic traits and manipulative behaviors in UK legal practice, this article explores their impact on ethics, client trust, and professional well-being.

Legal Ombudsman’s Inaction Against Burnett’s: Undermining Public Trust and Setting Dangerous Precedents
Case Studies

Legal Ombudsman’s Inaction Against Burnett’s: Undermining Public Trust and Setting Dangerous Precedents

Written by John Barwell 10 July 202417 August 2026

The Legal Ombudsman’s inaction on a complaint against Burnett’s Solicitors undermines public trust and sets a dangerous precedent for UK legal regulation.

The Ethics of Narrative Manipulation in Legal Practice: Lessons from the Burnetts Solicitors Case
Case Studies

The Ethics of Narrative Manipulation in Legal Practice: Lessons from the Burnetts Solicitors Case

Written by John Barwell 10 July 202417 August 2026

Unethical narrative manipulation by solicitors undermines justice and public trust. Explore the Burnetts case’s implications for legal ethics and integrity.

ICO Inaction: Undermining GDPR and Public Trust in Data Protection
Case Studies

ICO Inaction: Undermining GDPR and Public Trust in Data Protection

Written by John Barwell 9 July 202417 August 2026

ICO’s inaction on Burnetts Solicitors complaints undermines GDPR enforcement and public trust in data protection.

The Ethics of Narrative Manipulation in Legal Practice: Lessons from the Burnetts Solicitors Case
Case Studies

The Ethics of Narrative Manipulation in Legal Practice: Lessons from the Burnetts Solicitors Case

Written by John Barwell 8 July 202417 August 2026

Unethical narrative manipulation by solicitors undermines justice and public trust. Explore the Burnetts case’s implications for legal ethics and integrity.

The Emotional Burden: Navigating Unethical Law Firms and Regulatory Hurdles in the UK
Legal Practice

The Emotional Burden: Navigating Unethical Law Firms and Regulatory Hurdles in the UK

Written by John Barwell 7 July 202417 August 2026

Clients face emotional distress when unethical law firms and ineffective regulators fail them. Explore the mental health toll and need for systemic change.

Inside the Legal Ombudsman: Key Insights from a Recent FOIA Request
Regulatory Matters

Inside the Legal Ombudsman: Key Insights from a Recent FOIA Request

Written by John Barwell 6 July 202417 August 2026

A FOIA request reveals insights into the Legal Ombudsman’s complaint handling and decision-making processes, crucial for understanding UK legal oversight.

The Ethics of Narrative Manipulation in Legal Practice: Balancing Advocacy and Integrity
Legal Ethics

The Ethics of Narrative Manipulation in Legal Practice: Balancing Advocacy and Integrity

Written by John Barwell 6 July 202417 August 2026

Unethical narrative manipulation by solicitors undermines justice and public trust. Explore the implications for legal ethics and integrity.

Burnetts Solicitors: Balancing Professional Failings and Social Media Presence
Case Studies

Burnetts Solicitors: Balancing Professional Failings and Social Media Presence

Written by John Barwell 5 July 202417 August 2026

Burnetts Solicitors faces allegations of misconduct while maintaining a self-promotional LinkedIn presence. Explore the ethical implications and public perception impact.

Unveiling SRA’s Transparency: Insights from a Recent Information Request
Regulatory Matters

Unveiling SRA’s Transparency: Insights from a Recent Information Request

Written by John Barwell 5 July 202419 August 2026

An information request reveals the SRA’s complaint handling and decision-making processes, highlighting their commitment to transparency and accountability.

Page navigation

Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 13 Next

Recent Posts

  • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
  • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy