Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
      • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
      • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
      • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
      • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: UK Law

  • Home
  • UK Law
  • Page 7
The Hidden Cost of Speaking Out: Whistleblowers’ Mental Health Crisis
Regulatory Matters

The Hidden Cost of Speaking Out: Whistleblowers’ Mental Health Crisis

Written by John Barwell 20 August 202417 August 2026

In the UK, whistleblowers face a silent crisis, risking their careers and mental health when they expose wrongdoing. Discover how current protections may be failing them.

SRA Under Fire: Is the Legal Watchdog in England and Wales Failing to Protect the Public?
Case Studies

SRA Under Fire: Is the Legal Watchdog in England and Wales Failing to Protect the Public?

Written by John Barwell 19 August 202417 August 2026

The Solicitors Regulation Authority faces serious scrutiny over its effectiveness in protecting the public and supporting whistleblowers, raising urgent reform calls.

The Artful Dodgers of the UK Legal System: A Story of Evasion and Accountability
Regulatory Matters

The Artful Dodgers of the UK Legal System: A Story of Evasion and Accountability

Written by John Barwell 17 August 202417 August 2026

UK legal regulators face conflicts of interest due to financial ties, compromising their ability to enforce standards effectively.

The Inadequacies of the UK Whistleblower Framework: How Legal Tactics Undermine Protected Disclosures
Case Studies

The Inadequacies of the UK Whistleblower Framework: How Legal Tactics Undermine Protected Disclosures

Written by John Barwell 16 August 202417 August 2026

Critique of the UK whistleblower framework, exposing legal tactics that undermine protections and discourage public interest disclosures.

The SRA: A Regulator Failing in Its Duty to Protect the Public
Case Studies

The SRA: A Regulator Failing in Its Duty to Protect the Public

Written by John Barwell 14 August 202417 August 2026

The SRA is criticized for its failure to enforce legal standards, selective enforcement, and conflicts of interest, raising serious concerns about its regulatory effectiveness.

Conspiracy to Defraud: Unpacking the Legal Ramifications in the BPS Case
Case Studies

Conspiracy to Defraud: Unpacking the Legal Ramifications in the BPS Case

Written by John Barwell 11 August 202417 August 2026

Explore the complexities of conspiracy to defraud under UK law, its implications for corporate governance, and the potential legal consequences for those involved.

The Neuroscience of Confirmation Bias: Implications for Legal Proceedings and Therapeutic Approaches
Dispute Resolution

The Neuroscience of Confirmation Bias: Implications for Legal Proceedings and Therapeutic Approaches

Written by John Barwell 9 August 202417 August 2026

Understanding confirmation bias is crucial for Litigants in Person to improve decision-making in UK legal proceedings.

Regulating the Private Security Sector: Understanding the Private Security Industry Act 2001 and Addressing Current Challenges
Regulatory Matters

Regulating the Private Security Sector: Understanding the Private Security Industry Act 2001 and Addressing Current Challenges

Written by John Barwell 8 August 202417 August 2026

Addressing non-compliance in the UK’s private security sector: enhancing PSIA 2001 enforcement to ensure public safety and industry integrity.

The Impact of Confirmation Bias on Litigants in Person: Psychological Consequences and Coping Strategies
Dispute Resolution

The Impact of Confirmation Bias on Litigants in Person: Psychological Consequences and Coping Strategies

Written by John Barwell 7 August 202417 August 2026

Exploring the impact of confirmation bias on Litigants in Person in the UK legal system, with strategies for overcoming cognitive challenges and enhancing legal outcomes.

Confirmation Bias in Legal Proceedings: Implications for Legal Professionals and Litigants in Person
Legal Ethics

Confirmation Bias in Legal Proceedings: Implications for Legal Professionals and Litigants in Person

Written by John Barwell 6 August 202417 August 2026

Exploring confirmation bias in the UK legal system, this article discusses its impact on legal professionals, Litigants in Person, and judicial decision-making.

Page navigation

Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 13 Next

Recent Posts

  • Pay into court or stop your claim: when a defendant can demand security for costs, and the threats litigants in person can ignore
  • Participation, not pity: how the civil courts must accommodate vulnerable litigants in person
  • Eight per cent and counting: the statutory interest litigants in person forget to claim
  • Issued is not served: the four-month claim form deadline that quietly ends claims
  • Complaining about a judge: what the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can and cannot do
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy