Discover how The Chimp Paradox can help Litigants in Person control emotions, think strategically, and improve their legal success.
A football academy scandal exposes document tampering, legal threats, and systemic failures in protecting young players.
Over-relying on AI in court proceedings can lead to serious legal missteps, from misinterpreted case law to procedural errors—human oversight is essential.
Burnetts Solicitors LLP and Balliol Property Services have failed to respond to serious legal allegations—now they will face the courts, regulators, and public scrutiny.
In an era where justice is increasingly elusive, a disturbing trend has emerged—not from misguided litigants in person (LiPs), but from the legal teams representing powerful respondents.
For many, navigating the legal system without professional representation is a daunting task. Known as Litigants in Person (LiPs), these individuals take on the courts without the benefit of a solicitor or barrister, often due to financial constraints or a deep belief in their own cause. While some manage their cases successfully, others fall into […]
The UK’s whistleblowing laws are outdated, leaving many workers unprotected. The Office of the Whistleblower Bill aims to fix this with independent enforcement, regulatory penalties, and stronger safeguards.
With legal fees soaring, more people are representing themselves in court as Litigants in Person (LiPs).
The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is often seen as a bureaucratic maze where complaints drag on and consumers feel unheard. Yet, my recent experience challenged this perception.
Learn how Litigants in Person can avoid common legal pitfalls and improve their chances of success in court through strategic, procedural, and professional approaches.
