In my previous articles, I’ve criticised the SRA’s failures extensively. The Axiom Ince scandal is just one example that highlights how a body meant to regulate the profession often appears to shield it instead. However, I now find myself at a point where I must engage with the wider regulatory system, specifically the Solicitors Disciplinary […]
The SRA is supposed to regulate the legal profession, uphold justice, and protect the public, but instead, it behaves like an inept sheriff in a lawless Wild West town—drunk, incapable, and ultimately indifferent to the chaos surrounding it.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has intensified its response to the unfolding crisis surrounding Axiom Ince, banning two former employees from the profession.
In the current legal environment, many individuals find themselves compelled to act as litigants in person (LiPs), often driven by economic necessity due to the prohibitive costs associated with formal legal representation.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has issued a response to the damning findings of the Legal Services Board’s independent review into its handling of Axiom Ince Limited. Despite the gravity of the failures identified, the SRA has opted for a classic playbook approach: sidestepping responsibility, deflecting blame, and wrapping themselves in layers of positive spin. The […]
The SRA plays a crucial role in overseeing the standards and conduct of solicitors across England and Wales. As a regulatory body, it must uphold a transparent and fair process for handling complaints about its services.
The SRA has found itself at the centre of intense scrutiny following the release of an independent report that shines a light on substantial failings in its regulatory approach.
Today, the Legal Services Board (LSB) announced that it had begun enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority, following an independent review into the regulator’s handling of Axiom Ince Limited—a law firm that collapsed in October 2023, leaving behind significant financial damage.
This article critically examines procedural and ethical concerns in a lease forfeiture case involving Burnetts Solicitors. Issues include the concealment of a bailiff’s identity, non-compliance with transparency obligations, and significant procedural anomalies, calling into question the firm’s adherence to ethical standards.
The Midgley v Vossloh Cogifer UK Ltd case reveals how unethical tactics by experienced legal professionals can mislead the court, especially against unrepresented claimants, leading to unintended legal outcomes. This article explores the implications for tribunal governance and legal ethics.
