The Midgley v Vossloh Cogifer UK Ltd case reveals how unethical tactics by experienced legal professionals can mislead the court, especially against unrepresented claimants, leading to unintended legal outcomes. This article explores the implications for tribunal governance and legal ethics.
The Myth of Fairness The presumption that the UK justice system is inherently fair and impartial is a comforting yet ultimately misleading notion. For many LiPs, this perception of fairness is wholly detached from reality. Increasingly, there is a pervasive sentiment that the justice system is not only rigged but disproportionately skewed in favour of […]
This article explores the sophisticated procedural tactics often employed by represented defendants in Employment Tribunals, such as late submissions and document overload, which place unrepresented claimants at a disadvantage. It offers strategies for Litigants in Person (LiPs) to counteract these pressures and assert their rights effectively.
Navigating the Employment Tribunal system is particularly challenging for claimants representing themselves as Litigants in Person (LiPs), especially when faced with late submissions of key documents by represented defendants. This article explores the impact of such tactics and offers strategies for LiPs to protect their rights and ensure procedural fairness.
The UK legal system aims to ensure fairness and access to justice for all, but Litigants in Person (LiPs) often face significant disadvantages compared to represented parties, despite provisions in the Civil Procedure Rules designed to assist them. This article explores the challenges faced by LiPs and suggests potential reforms to create a more equitable legal environment.
The submission of evidence directly to a judge by opposing counsel during proceedings, particularly without formal request or disclosure, poses significant legal and ethical issues that can compromise the fairness and integrity of the judicial process, especially in online UK court proceedings.
Vexatious conduct involves disruptive behaviour in legal proceedings aimed at undermining justice, and claimants can avoid falling into this trap by maintaining composure, careful communication, and professional conduct.
Explore the challenges with the ICO’s complaints process and discover effective strategies for addressing shortcomings in the UK’s data protection framework.
Discover the challenges individuals face in accessing personal data under GDPR, as I recount my struggle against deliberate obstruction of a Subject Access Request.
Discover how law firms obstruct Subject Access Requests (SARs) and the need for regulatory accountability. We’re back to share insights and empower your rights.
