Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
      • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
      • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
      • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
      • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: access to justice

  • Home
  • access to justice
  • Page 3
When the Regulator Looks Away: A Blind Client’s Ordeal Through Legal Misconduct and Institutional Evasion
Regulatory Matters

When the Regulator Looks Away: A Blind Client’s Ordeal Through Legal Misconduct and Institutional Evasion

Written by John Barwell 7 September 202518 August 2026

A blind client’s ordeal with the Ministry of Justice reveals how insurers, solicitors, and the SRA collude to deny justice and accountability.

Employment Tribunals and the Lone Claimant: The Hidden Rules of Engagement
Regulatory Matters

Employment Tribunals and the Lone Claimant: The Hidden Rules of Engagement

Written by John Barwell 17 July 202518 August 2026

Even after sweeping reforms, Employment Tribunals remain an uphill battle for self-represented claimants—especially ex-police officers suddenly cut adrift by the Federation.

“Computer Says No”: When Civil Courts Penalise the Public for Their Own Errors
Case Studies

“Computer Says No”: When Civil Courts Penalise the Public for Their Own Errors

Written by John Barwell 2 July 202518 August 2026

CE-File rejections turned a routine N244 into a £125k catastrophe, spotlighting how civil-court processes punish litigants in person.

LiPs Still Fighting Uphill: How Reform Has Fallen Short on Procedural Fairness
Dispute Resolution

LiPs Still Fighting Uphill: How Reform Has Fallen Short on Procedural Fairness

Written by John Barwell 11 June 202518 August 2026

A decade of procedural tweaks has not stopped judges’ lists and legal tactics from tilting the scales against litigants in person.

Corruption and Complicity: Misconduct by Solicitors in UK Employment Tribunals
Regulatory Matters

Corruption and Complicity: Misconduct by Solicitors in UK Employment Tribunals

Written by John Barwell 7 June 202518 August 2026

A scathing look at how corrupt solicitors exploit Employment Tribunals—and how the SRA’s inertia makes it possible.

Employment Tribunals and Systemic Barriers for Litigants in Person (LiPs): A Case for Reform
Regulatory Matters

Employment Tribunals and Systemic Barriers for Litigants in Person (LiPs): A Case for Reform

Written by John Barwell 30 March 202518 August 2026

Employment tribunals were meant to be accessible for all, but unrepresented claimants—known as Litigants in Person—face a justice system that’s structurally rigged.

Procedural Barriers Facing Litigants in Person in the UK – Analysis and Recommendations
Dispute Resolution

Procedural Barriers Facing Litigants in Person in the UK – Analysis and Recommendations

Written by John Barwell 27 February 202518 August 2026

Discover the key obstacles UK Litigants in Person face and practical strategies to overcome them.

Paul Millinder’s Legal Odyssey Enters a New Phase
Dispute Resolution

Paul Millinder’s Legal Odyssey Enters a New Phase

Written by John Barwell 17 February 202518 August 2026

For years, businessman Paul Millinder has been labelled a vexatious litigant, his pursuit of justice dismissed as obsessive. Yet, his case reveals a troubling pattern of judicial manoeuvring, fraudulent insolvency proceedings, and suppressed evidence.

The Chimp, The Computer, and the LiP: A Battle Between Emotion and Strategy
Dispute Resolution

The Chimp, The Computer, and the LiP: A Battle Between Emotion and Strategy

Written by John Barwell 12 February 202518 August 2026

Discover how The Chimp Paradox can help Litigants in Person control emotions, think strategically, and improve their legal success.

Exposing the Systematic Rot Crushing Credible Claims
Dispute Resolution

Exposing the Systematic Rot Crushing Credible Claims

Written by John Barwell 8 February 202518 August 2026

In an era where justice is increasingly elusive, a disturbing trend has emerged—not from misguided litigants in person (LiPs), but from the legal teams representing powerful respondents.

Page navigation

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Next

Recent Posts

  • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
  • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
  • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
  • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
  • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy