Tag: access to justice

Access to Justice

The Misconception of Fairness in the UK Justice System: A Litigant in Person’s Perspective

Written by John Barwell

Access to justice · Litigants in person · Public confidence The justice system is often described as fair, neutral and accessible. For many litigants in person, that description does not match the lived experience. The deeper issue is not simply individual disappointment with case outcomes, but whether the system gives unrepresented people a realistic opportunity … Continue reading “The Misconception of Fairness in the UK Justice System: A Litigant in Person’s Perspective”

Dispute Resolution

The Tactical Terrain: Further Challenges for Litigants in Person in Employment Tribunals

Written by John Barwell

This article explores the sophisticated procedural tactics often employed by represented defendants in Employment Tribunals, such as late submissions and document overload, which place unrepresented claimants at a disadvantage. It offers strategies for Litigants in Person (LiPs) to counteract these pressures and assert their rights effectively.

Dispute Resolution

Employment Tribunals: Challenges for Litigants in Person Against Represented Defendants

Written by John Barwell

Navigating the Employment Tribunal system is particularly challenging for claimants representing themselves as Litigants in Person (LiPs), especially when faced with late submissions of key documents by represented defendants. This article explores the impact of such tactics and offers strategies for LiPs to protect their rights and ensure procedural fairness.

Dispute Resolution

The UK Legal System: Fairness for Litigants in Person versus Represented Parties

Written by John Barwell

The UK legal system aims to ensure fairness and access to justice for all, but Litigants in Person (LiPs) often face significant disadvantages compared to represented parties, despite provisions in the Civil Procedure Rules designed to assist them. This article explores the challenges faced by LiPs and suggests potential reforms to create a more equitable legal environment.