Employment tribunals were meant to be accessible for all, but unrepresented claimants—known as Litigants in Person—face a justice system that’s structurally rigged.
Discover the key obstacles UK Litigants in Person face and practical strategies to overcome them.
For years, businessman Paul Millinder has been labelled a vexatious litigant, his pursuit of justice dismissed as obsessive. Yet, his case reveals a troubling pattern of judicial manoeuvring, fraudulent insolvency proceedings, and suppressed evidence.
Discover how The Chimp Paradox can help Litigants in Person control emotions, think strategically, and improve their legal success.
In an era where justice is increasingly elusive, a disturbing trend has emerged—not from misguided litigants in person (LiPs), but from the legal teams representing powerful respondents.
For many, navigating the legal system without professional representation is a daunting task. Known as Litigants in Person (LiPs), these individuals take on the courts without the benefit of a solicitor or barrister, often due to financial constraints or a deep belief in their own cause. While some manage their cases successfully, others fall into […]
With legal fees soaring, more people are representing themselves in court as Litigants in Person (LiPs).
Is Capsticks weaponising legal loopholes to silence whistleblowers before their claims are heard?
SRA faces judicial review over alleged regulatory failures and calls for reform.
The UK justice system faces an unprecedented crisis due to decades of underfunding and judicial inefficiencies, worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. With case backlogs in Crown and civil courts leaving victims, defendants, and litigants in limbo, the government risks breaching human rights obligations under Article 6(1) of the ECHR. This article examines the human cost of delays, state accountability, and urgent reforms needed to restore public confidence and uphold justice.