Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
      • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
      • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
      • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
      • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
      • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
      • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: access to justice

  • Home
  • access to justice
  • Page 2
Employment Tribunals: why one queue for every workplace dispute is failing
Dispute Resolution

Employment Tribunals: why one queue for every workplace dispute is failing

Written by John Barwell 27 June 202619 August 2026

Employment Tribunals are under pressure. Legal Lens explains why the backlog is a route-design problem, not just a delay problem.

Sent is not served: the email mistake that can lose a civil claim
Regulatory Matters

Sent is not served: the email mistake that can lose a civil claim

Written by John Barwell 22 June 202619 August 2026

Sending is communication. Service is a legal act. This Legal Lens article explains why emailing a civil claim form can fail if the rules on service, solicitor authority, email consent, nominated addresses, sealed documents and timing are not followed.

Online civil courts: when access to justice becomes a login problem
Dispute Resolution

Online civil courts: when access to justice becomes a login problem

Written by John Barwell 21 June 202619 August 2026

A Legal Lens article on online civil courts, digital filing, email service, default judgment, vulnerable users and why a login problem can become a legal problem.

Employment Tribunals: The Problem Starts Long Before the Hearing
Dispute Resolution

Employment Tribunals: The Problem Starts Long Before the Hearing

Written by John Barwell 21 May 202618 August 2026

Most workers do not start with an ET1. They reach employment tribunal after workplace processes, grievances, Acas early conciliation and settlement opportunities have failed. Reform must start before the tribunal door.

Why the British justice system sometimes feels morally unfair
Dispute Resolution

Why the British justice system sometimes feels morally unfair

Written by John Barwell 24 January 202618 August 2026

Why courts often reach outcomes that feel unfair — and what litigants in person must understand about law, evidence, and procedure in England & Wales.

Judicial Guidance Quietly Removes Written Evidence Option for Disabled Litigants
Regulatory Matters

Judicial Guidance Quietly Removes Written Evidence Option for Disabled Litigants

Written by John Barwell 14 January 202618 August 2026

A quiet May 2025 change to the Equal Treatment Bench Book removed a written-only evidence adjustment for mental health disabilities—raising concerns about access to justice as tribunals demand increasingly “objective” medical proof for adjustments and postponements.

Legal work is not a single task. So why are we still using single-purpose tools?
Legal Innovation

Legal work is not a single task. So why are we still using single-purpose tools?

Written by John Barwell 2 January 202618 August 2026

A reliability-first UK casework app in development to organise cases, evidence, chronologies, correspondence and SARs—without the hype.

AI and the Self-Represented: How Technology Is Redefining the Fight for Justice
Regulatory Matters

AI and the Self-Represented: How Technology Is Redefining the Fight for Justice

Written by John Barwell 13 October 202518 August 2026

A new era of self-representation is emerging as litigants in person use strategy, structure, and AI tools to navigate a justice system once reserved for lawyers.

How to Bring a Professional Negligence or Contract Claim: A 2025 Roadmap for Litigants in Person
Access to Justice

How to Bring a Professional Negligence or Contract Claim: A 2025 Roadmap for Litigants in Person

Written by John Barwell 18 September 202518 August 2026

A practical guide showing how landmark English cases help Litigants in Person build stronger negligence and contract claims.

How Litigants in Person Can Defend Against Strike-Out and Deposit Order Applications in Employment Tribunals
Regulatory Matters

How Litigants in Person Can Defend Against Strike-Out and Deposit Order Applications in Employment Tribunals

Written by John Barwell 8 September 202518 August 2026

A practical guide for Litigants in Person on resisting strike-out, deposit order, and costs applications in UK employment tribunals.

Page navigation

Previous 1 2 3 4 … 7 Next

Recent Posts

  • Four tracks, one questionnaire: how CPR Part 26 decides where your case goes after a defence is filed
  • Ended before it starts: summary judgment and strike out under CPR Part 24 and rule 3.4 for litigants in person
  • Help with Fees: the court fee remission scheme litigants in person keep paying past
  • The tenancy deposit penalty claim: the simplest court claim a litigant in person can bring
  • Claiming compensation for a data breach: the court route the ICO cannot give you
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy