The Myth of Fairness The presumption that the UK justice system is inherently fair and impartial is a comforting yet ultimately misleading notion. For many LiPs, this perception of fairness is wholly detached from reality. Increasingly, there is a pervasive sentiment that the justice system is not only rigged but disproportionately skewed in favour of […]
This article explores the sophisticated procedural tactics often employed by represented defendants in Employment Tribunals, such as late submissions and document overload, which place unrepresented claimants at a disadvantage. It offers strategies for Litigants in Person (LiPs) to counteract these pressures and assert their rights effectively.
The UK legal system aims to ensure fairness and access to justice for all, but Litigants in Person (LiPs) often face significant disadvantages compared to represented parties, despite provisions in the Civil Procedure Rules designed to assist them. This article explores the challenges faced by LiPs and suggests potential reforms to create a more equitable legal environment.
Navigating the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) as a Lay Applicant can be complex. This guide outlines the application process, key considerations, and challenges.
The Neuroscience of Confirmation Bias: Implications for Legal Proceedings and Therapeutic Approaches
Understanding confirmation bias is crucial for Litigants in Person to improve decision-making in UK legal proceedings.
Exploring how the Civil Procedure Rules create barriers for Litigants in Person and proposing solutions for equal access to justice in the UK legal system.
Systemic power imbalances in the legal system disadvantage self-represented litigants, undermining fairness and access to justice.