I’ve always been fascinated by the intricate workings of the legal profession and the delicate balance law firms must maintain to uphold justice and integrity. Recently, a scenario caught my attention that highlights the profound impact of being labelled as “vexatious.” Traditionally, this term has been associated with individuals who misuse the legal system to […]
The SRA’s new guidance for in-house solicitors highlights ethical responsibilities but raises questions about the practical challenges of reporting wrongdoing in hostile workplaces.
An open letter demanding urgent reform of the Solicitors Regulation Authority due to repeated regulatory failures.
Judges must call out misconduct and promote transparency to restore public trust in the UK’s legal system.
Conflicts of interest, hidden networks, and a lack of accountability plague the UK justice system—who stands to benefit, and what needs to change?
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) can seem like an intimidating body, especially when challenging misconduct in the legal profession. This guide aims to simplify the process for those who want to apply directly to the SDT without the help of a lawyer, making it clearer how to work within this regulatory framework.
In my previous articles, I’ve criticised the SRA’s failures extensively. The Axiom Ince scandal is just one example that highlights how a body meant to regulate the profession often appears to shield it instead. However, I now find myself at a point where I must engage with the wider regulatory system, specifically the Solicitors Disciplinary […]
The SRA is supposed to regulate the legal profession, uphold justice, and protect the public, but instead, it behaves like an inept sheriff in a lawless Wild West town—drunk, incapable, and ultimately indifferent to the chaos surrounding it.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has intensified its response to the unfolding crisis surrounding Axiom Ince, banning two former employees from the profession.
In the current legal environment, many individuals find themselves compelled to act as litigants in person (LiPs), often driven by economic necessity due to the prohibitive costs associated with formal legal representation.