The Solicitors Regulation Authority has issued a response to the damning findings of the Legal Services Board’s independent review into its handling of Axiom Ince Limited. Despite the gravity of the failures identified, the SRA has opted for a classic playbook approach: sidestepping responsibility, deflecting blame, and wrapping themselves in layers of positive spin. The […]
The SRA plays a crucial role in overseeing the standards and conduct of solicitors across England and Wales. As a regulatory body, it must uphold a transparent and fair process for handling complaints about its services.
The SRA has found itself at the centre of intense scrutiny following the release of an independent report that shines a light on substantial failings in its regulatory approach.
Today, the Legal Services Board (LSB) announced that it had begun enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority, following an independent review into the regulator’s handling of Axiom Ince Limited—a law firm that collapsed in October 2023, leaving behind significant financial damage.
A close examination of the Solicitors Regulation Authority reviews on Trustpilot reveals an overwhelming number of negative experiences, which paints a troubling picture of the current state of legal regulation in the United Kingdom.
Navigating the legal system as a litigant in person (LiP) can be a mentally exhausting and daunting endeavour. This article delves into the systemic power imbalances, regulatory failures, and profound psychological impacts experienced by those without legal representation, advocating for essential reforms to ensure fairness and support for all individuals in their pursuit of justice.
This article examines why many solicitors who begin with high ethical standards gradually compromise their values. It discusses the cultural and systemic pressures within the legal profession, and offers a call to action for restoring integrity and fairness in the UK legal system.
This article critically examines procedural and ethical concerns in a lease forfeiture case involving Burnetts Solicitors. Issues include the concealment of a bailiff’s identity, non-compliance with transparency obligations, and significant procedural anomalies, calling into question the firm’s adherence to ethical standards.
It is time to confront an uncomfortable truth: why do some legal professionals bend the rules, and what can we do to stop it? The Culture of Rule-Bending Many within the British legal system are all too familiar with an unfortunate reality: some solicitors and barristers employ tactics that manipulate procedural nuances, thereby undermining the […]
The Midgley v Vossloh Cogifer UK Ltd case reveals how unethical tactics by experienced legal professionals can mislead the court, especially against unrepresented claimants, leading to unintended legal outcomes. This article explores the implications for tribunal governance and legal ethics.