Conflicts of interest, hidden networks, and a lack of accountability plague the UK justice system—who stands to benefit, and what needs to change?
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) can seem like an intimidating body, especially when challenging misconduct in the legal profession. This guide aims to simplify the process for those who want to apply directly to the SDT without the help of a lawyer, making it clearer how to work within this regulatory framework.
SDT applications · Regulatory process · Legal accountability Criticising the SRA may be justified in many cases, but anyone seeking professional accountability must still understand the route. A direct application to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal requires more than frustration with the regulator: it requires evidence, procedural discipline and a record showing that the right steps … Continue reading “Taking the SDT Path Forward: Navigating Accountability in a Flawed System”
John Barwell clarifies the correct process for lay applications to the SDT, addressing misconceptions and providing accurate guidance.
A new judicial exemption under the Data Protection Act 2018 limits access to judges’ notes, quietly curbing transparency and sparking debate on fairness and accountability.
Access to justice · Litigants in person · Public confidence The justice system is often described as fair, neutral and accessible. For many litigants in person, that description does not match the lived experience. The deeper issue is not simply individual disappointment with case outcomes, but whether the system gives unrepresented people a realistic opportunity … Continue reading “The Misconception of Fairness in the UK Justice System: A Litigant in Person’s Perspective”
The submission of evidence directly to a judge by opposing counsel during proceedings, particularly without formal request or disclosure, poses significant legal and ethical issues that can compromise the fairness and integrity of the judicial process, especially in online UK court proceedings.
Vexatious conduct involves disruptive behaviour in legal proceedings aimed at undermining justice, and claimants can avoid falling into this trap by maintaining composure, careful communication, and professional conduct.
Discover how law firms obstruct Subject Access Requests (SARs) and the need for regulatory accountability. We’re back to share insights and empower your rights.
Navigate the complexities of UK civil litigation with insights into witness statements and expert reports, essential for building a strong case and ensuring success.
