Skip to content
Legal Lens

Legal Lens

Independent, practical help for litigants in person in England & Wales.

Search for:
Log in
Register

Menu

Close
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • The right to be accompanied: using a workplace companion before tribunal
      • No substantial dispute of fact? The Part 8 route for civil claims
      • When a witness will not attend: witness summonses under CPR Part 34
      • Complaining to the ICO after the Data (Use and Access) Act: the new complaint-handling duty and what it changes
      • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Legal Lens
  • About Legal Lens
    • About Us
    • Who Funds Us?
    • Values, Policies & Protocols
  • Blog
    • Latest Posts
      • The right to be accompanied: using a workplace companion before tribunal
      • No substantial dispute of fact? The Part 8 route for civil claims
      • When a witness will not attend: witness summonses under CPR Part 34
      • Complaining to the ICO after the Data (Use and Access) Act: the new complaint-handling duty and what it changes
      • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
    • Case Reports
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Legal Innovation
    • Legal Practice
    • Regulatory Matters
    • UK Legal System
  • Get Involved
    • Judicial Review Against the SRA
    • Write for Us
    • Support Us
    • Syndication and Copyright
  • Factsheets & Tools
    • Factsheets
    • Tools
    • Basic Assistance Directory
    • Peer Support Network
    • Trusted Directory
  • Contact & Free Assessment
Search for:
Log in
Register

Tag: #LegalReform

  • Home
  • #LegalReform
The Digital Divide in UK Courts: Navigating System Access as a Litigant in Person (LiP)
Access to Justice

The Digital Divide in UK Courts: Navigating System Access as a Litigant in Person (LiP)

Written by John Barwell 24 July 202417 August 2026

The digital divide in UK courts disadvantages Litigants in Person, making it harder for them to navigate the legal system compared to represented parties. #AccessToJustice

The Evolution of PIDA: How Gilham v Ministry of Justice Reshaped UK Whistleblower Protection
Case Studies

The Evolution of PIDA: How Gilham v Ministry of Justice Reshaped UK Whistleblower Protection

Written by John Barwell 20 July 202417 August 2026

Gilham v Ministry of Justice reshapes UK whistleblower protection, expanding PIDA’s scope and highlighting the importance of public awareness and judicial accountability.

Why the Public Disclosure Act Fails to Protect Whistleblowers: Uncovering Legal Loopholes
Regulatory Matters

Why the Public Disclosure Act Fails to Protect Whistleblowers: Uncovering Legal Loopholes

Written by John Barwell 19 June 202419 August 2026

The Public Disclosure Act fails to protect whistleblowers, who face SLAPPs, NDAs, and harassment, necessitating urgent legal reforms for transparency and justice.

Why Whistleblowers Are Scared to Speak: Unmasking Legal Barriers and Regulatory Bias
Regulatory Matters

Why Whistleblowers Are Scared to Speak: Unmasking Legal Barriers and Regulatory Bias

Written by John Barwell 18 June 202419 August 2026

Exploring the obstacles faced by whistleblowers, including SLAPPs, NDAs, and cost orders, and the manipulation of the Public Disclosure Act 1998.

Balancing Justice and Ethics: The Ethical Dilemmas of Solicitors in the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry
Access to Justice

Balancing Justice and Ethics: The Ethical Dilemmas of Solicitors in the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

Written by John Barwell 17 June 202419 August 2026

Examining the ethical lapses in the legal profession highlighted by the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the need for stronger enforcement of SRA principles.

Conflicts of Interest in Independent Reviews: Ensuring Fairness in Legal Regulation
Regulatory Matters

Conflicts of Interest in Independent Reviews: Ensuring Fairness in Legal Regulation

Written by John Barwell 16 June 202419 August 2026

Exploring conflicts of interest in independent reviews, the impact of funding and operational structures, and safeguards to ensure impartiality in legal investigations.

Balancing the Scales: Evaluating the Funding Challenges of the Legal Ombudsman
Regulatory Matters

Balancing the Scales: Evaluating the Funding Challenges of the Legal Ombudsman

Written by John Barwell 15 June 202419 August 2026

Examining the Legal Ombudsman’s funding model and its impact on impartiality, proposing reforms to enhance transparency and maintain public trust.

SRA Oversight: Mishandled Evidence & Regulatory Failures
Case Studies

SRA Oversight: Mishandled Evidence & Regulatory Failures

Written by John Barwell 14 June 202419 August 2026

Examining the SRA’s oversight failures in handling complaints against Burnetts Solicitors, highlighting evidence mishandling and conflicts of interest in independent reviews.

When the Watchdog Fails: Analysing the Legal Ombudsman’s Shortcomings
Case Studies

When the Watchdog Fails: Analysing the Legal Ombudsman’s Shortcomings

Written by John Barwell 13 June 202419 August 2026

Examining the Legal Ombudsman’s shortcomings in handling complaints, highlighting the need for comprehensive reforms to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability.

Funding Dilemmas: Examining the Implications of CEDR’s Funding by the SRA for Independent Reviews
Regulatory Matters

Funding Dilemmas: Examining the Implications of CEDR’s Funding by the SRA for Independent Reviews

Written by John Barwell 12 June 202419 August 2026

Exploring the impact of the current funding model on the impartiality of the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) in overseeing the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), and proposing reforms for an independent and credible review process.

Page navigation

1 2 Next

Recent Posts

  • The right to be accompanied: using a workplace companion before tribunal
  • No substantial dispute of fact? The Part 8 route for civil claims
  • When a witness will not attend: witness summonses under CPR Part 34
  • Complaining to the ICO after the Data (Use and Access) Act: the new complaint-handling duty and what it changes
  • The Financial Ombudsman’s award limits in 2026: what the free complaint route can actually order a firm to pay
Legal Lens

About Legal Lens

  • About Us
  • Who Funds Us?
  • Values, Policies & Protocols

Privacy & Integrity

  • Editorial Standards
  • Investigative Journalism
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Terms of Use

Get Involved

  • Write for Us
  • Support Us
  • Syndication and Copyright

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • john@legallens.org.uk

© Legal Lens 2026. All rights reserved, except our articles, which are published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Registered with the ICO (ZB903494). Professional indemnity and cyber risk insurance held.

Privacy Policy