A police inspector’s dismissal reveals how Capsticks’ heavy-handed legal tactics influence misconduct hearings, raising serious concerns about fairness and transparency.
The legal system’s failure to support Litigants in Person (LiPs) is causing significant mental health challenges, exposing the urgent need for reform.
It is time to confront an uncomfortable truth: why do some legal professionals bend the rules, and what can we do to stop it? The Culture of Rule-Bending Many within the British legal system are all too familiar with an unfortunate reality: some solicitors and barristers employ tactics that manipulate procedural nuances, thereby undermining the […]
This article explores the sophisticated procedural tactics often employed by represented defendants in Employment Tribunals, such as late submissions and document overload, which place unrepresented claimants at a disadvantage. It offers strategies for Litigants in Person (LiPs) to counteract these pressures and assert their rights effectively.
Navigating the Employment Tribunal system is particularly challenging for claimants representing themselves as Litigants in Person (LiPs), especially when faced with late submissions of key documents by represented defendants. This article explores the impact of such tactics and offers strategies for LiPs to protect their rights and ensure procedural fairness.
Exploring how the Civil Procedure Rules create barriers for Litigants in Person and proposing solutions for equal access to justice in the UK legal system.