The 48 Laws of Litigation: Power Plays for the Litigant in Person

When I wrote The Chimp, The Computer, and The LiP, I drew heavily on The Chimp Paradox, a book that explains how emotions and logic collide under pressure. The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene serves a similar purpose—especially for Litigants in Person (LiPs) navigating high-stakes litigation. Legal battles often feel overwhelming due to procedural complexities, tight deadlines, and aggressive opposition. Greene’s insights on power dynamics can help LiPs maintain strategic control without falling into ethical traps. This article explores five of his most relevant “laws,” adapted for self-representation, ensuring compliance with court rules while maximizing tactical advantage.

Litigants in Person and the Civil Restraint Order Trap

Litigants in Person · Civil Restraint Orders · Litigation Strategy A Litigant in Person can begin with a genuine sense of injustice and still end up in procedural danger. The Civil Restraint Order trap opens when persistence turns into repetition, every setback becomes proof of bias, and applications are made without legal merit. Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading “Litigants in Person and the Civil Restraint Order Trap”

Skip to toolbar